STM32F4 Interrupt Priority Issue Calling xQueueReceiveFromISR

Libraries
1

Hello, I am using STM32F4 with FreeRTOS. I have read through all the documentation multiple times and believe I have the interrupt priorities set correctly in my FreeRTOSConfig.h but am still getting an assert failure on priorities when calling xQueueReceiveFromISR in a CAN Rx ISR on rare occassions. The following is my FreeRTOSConfig.h snippet:

#define configPRIO_BITS 4
#define configLIBRARY_LOWEST_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY 15
#define configLIBRARY_MAX_SYSCALL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY 5
#define configKERNEL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY (configLIBRARY_LOWEST_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY << (8 - configPRIO_BITS))
#define configMAX_SYSCALL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY (configLIBRARY_MAX_SYSCALL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY << (8 - configPRIO_BITS))

The PriorityGrouping is set to NVIC_PRIORITYGROUP_4 as advised. The CAN Rx ISR priority is set to 5 at bootup before the scheduler is started and the following is what the ISR looks like:

void HAL_CAN_TxMailbox0CompleteCallback(CAN_HandleTypeDef* hcan) {
  can_frame_t message;
  if (xQueueReceiveFromISR(can_rx_queue, &message, NULL) == pdPASS) {
    (CAN_transmit_frame(hcan1, message.header.StdId, message.data, message.header.DLC);
  }
}

Sometimes I will get a fault due to an assert hitting from the function: portASSERT_IF_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY_INVALID() in queue.c which then calls configASSERT( ( portAIRCR_REG & portPRIORITY_GROUP_MASK ) <= ulMaxPRIGROUPValue ); in port.c

2

Can you see in the debugger what is the value of ulMaxPRIGROUPValue when the assertion fails? I’m guessing that field is corrupted or not yet established by FreeRTOS startup code.

3

Also, can you check the value of current priority grouping in addition to ulMaxPRIGROUPValue in the debugger? You can update the code to the following to get the current priority grouping:

volatile uint32_t ulCurrentInterruptGrouping;
ulCurrentInterruptGrouping = ( portAIRCR_REG & portPRIORITY_GROUP_MASK );
configASSERT( ulCurrentInterruptGrouping <= ulMaxPRIGROUPValue );

Thanks.

4

I was able to recreate and you are correct, it looks like ulMaxPRIGROUPValue is corrupted and set to 0 in this case.
Do you have any idea how/why this would happen? There are definitely interrupts triggering before the tasks are created and scheduler is started, could this be contributing?

5

Yes, I think you’re onto it there. If your ISRs make API calls to FreeRTOS, best to make sure FreeRTOS is up and running before enabling those interrupts.

6

That was it! I was able to move the interrupt enable after the scheduler was started and this fixed it.
Root cause was that this interrupt was firing before ulMaxPRIGROUPValue could get set to a non-zero value and was causing an assert.
Takeaway - Any ISR that has an RTOS function call with FromISR must be enabled after the scheduler has been started.
Thanks for the help!