I know you have sent me this email directly twice and I have not replied.
I get a whole lot of this type of email, containing great lists of things people want to know if I provide or support. This is actually a short list in comparison. Many times its obviously a standard list that is sent to all RTOS vendors for whatever reason.
I used to reply politely that all the information was available on the WEB site. However, just doing this takes up quite a bit of time.
This is a free open source project. That is giving quite a bit to you already. Unfortunately I don’t want to also spend my personal time doing your research for you too. There are no paid salesmen with a vested interest in making sure you get the answers you want to hear.
On the site, there is no answer to my questions (clearly)
All right for SafeTROS --> IEC61508
but for freeRTOS --> No answer clear, I suppose that it supports no standard
It’s exact ? YES or NO simply (it’s fast)
And for the domains of application (a fast response by cross, for example --> Space X)
Automotive / transport
Space
Nulear
Telecommunication
Medical
Defense / Military
Consumer electronics
You have an order of idea on the number of software options available for FreeRTOS ? 10> or 50> or 100>
Yes I can list software components but I can make a mistake
"On the site, there is no answer to my questions (clearly) "
I think that is the answer you want then. If there was DO-178B or other certification I think it might mention it.
"And for the domains of application (a fast response by cross, for example --> Space X)
Automotive / transport
Space
Nulear
Telecommunication
Medical
Defense / Military
Consumer electronics "
Which are you interested in? This is just a list. You doing a market survey? Probably gets used in all those, expect Nuclear.
I write for my studies a comparative document on the real-time solutions.
I found an element of indisputable comparison.
–> The support for the systems owner is incomparable…